Why hasn’t wireless EV charging taken off yet?
- Michael Alexander
- Mar 11
- 2 min read
Most people think it’s because the tech isn’t ready — but that’s not the full story.
For the last 10–15 years, almost every major project chased the same “obvious” path:
Embed coils continuously under the entire road
High power (50–200 kW) for fast cars on highways
Full-road reconstruction, no gaps, no compromises
The result? Costs exploded ($1.5–3.5 million per lane-km in Sweden, Korea, Israel pilots). Roads had to be torn up, repaved, and maintained for thermal expansion, water ingress, and wear. Governments and road authorities basically said “no thanks” — too expensive, too disruptive, too much liability.
Plug-in charging won by default: cheap home chargers ($300–600), fast public stations, and standards locked in early. Wireless had to compete not just with plugs, but with an ecosystem that matured faster than anyone expected.
But here’s what almost no one did:
Go roadside barrier only (no road cutting)
Use large intentional gaps (20–40% active zones only)
Start with low-power, light EVs first (e-trikes/ebikes on dedicated paths)
Combine sliding-window activation (power on just before the vehicle, off right after) + fan-cooled pilot design
That’s exactly what Super Volt is doing. It solves the cost/disruption problem that killed earlier visions. It starts with the easiest, most achievable use-case (light EVs on dedicated paths like Pasig River). And it scales later to highways once proven.
Most companies chased “high-power, continuous, cars-first” and got stuck on cost and politics. We went “low-power, gap-based, light-EVs-first, barrier-only” — a smart, pragmatic pivot that few others took.
This isn’t about inventing new physics. It’s about applying existing physics in a way that actually works in the real world — especially in cost-sensitive markets like the Philippines.
What do you think is the biggest remaining hurdle for wireless corridors to go mainstream? Cost? Regulation? Awareness? Drop your thoughts below — let’s talk about it.

















Comments